![]() I know Autodesk is working to improve Revit, but it does not seem that they are able to happily accommodate these Ideas into the next release. I think that should be at least as good as just dropping Autodesk a simple email. The ideas were posted on line in a forum specifically set up to solicit Ideas. Remember ideas are growing at about 900/year. If we also assume that all 39 accepted Ideas can be implemented in a year, twice the previous rate, the work out to an 8 year back log. I few assume that 10 percent of the 3,150 Ideas are good, that is 315 ideas. There were 39 Ideas implemented over the last 2 years that's about 20 per year. Looking at the Revit Ideas Forum, there are 3150 ideas gathering support, the oldest being from July, 2014. I am glad that Revit is working well for you, and that you have seen a lot Improvement in the past few years. Here are my thoughts on that.Įnd of rant. Just because you can do something, does not mean you should!Īnother Case in point is TEXT Vs MTEXT. There are so many new features now in AutoCAD, and some offer ok ability, but at a performance price. Similar principals should be taken into account on most systems or processes. If your standard is impacting performance or stability of your software system, then you need to re-evaluate your standards. Standards should be designed not only to make it easy to understand, but also to optimize the performance of the systems being used. I always recommend keeping spaces and any special chars out of descriptions, and keep them brief as possible. Not only do users now type entire sentences as layer names, but they will also load up 200+ layers in every drawing, then xref a large number of drawings into another drawing and wonder why the Layer Manager crashes, or is slow. Let's just talk about Layer Names for instance. Most users tend to paint themselves into a corner due to lack of understanding system limitations or exploiting feature abusively, then complain about it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |